Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Motorola 6847


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ~ Amkgp  💬  06:31, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Motorola 6847

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Obsolete and non-notable integrated circuit. WP:NCATALOG, WP:NDIR apply here. Mikeblas (talk) 02:58, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 03:12, 26 August 2020 (UTC) t


 * Keep Simply click the Google Books search link and you will find that a book was published about this chip and that it is also described in quite a few books, magazines and journals of the era. Yes, it is obsolete, but so is the Model T, Morse's telegraph and steam locomotives. Encyclopedias cover notable older technologies as well as current ones. This was significant personal computer technology 40 years ago, and is part of the history of early home computers. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  05:34, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Notable chip, which was state of the art in 1980 when used in the TRS-80 Color Computer. We should reference the material in the article, however, WP:NTEMPapplies to this chip. There are several books documenting the chip, Graphics Using the Motorola 6847 Integrated Circuit, and Microprocessor Data Book, Hackaday memorializes the obsolete chip. Lightburst (talk) 14:01, 26 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep intel 8086 is not used in any modern appliances anymore, but it has a historical significance. Same is true for the integrated chips which have been the step-stones for modern ICs. Obsolescence doesn't mean exclusion from encyclopedia, it satisfies WP:GNG. Mamushir (talk) 14:16, 26 August 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.