Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Motorola V276


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. --Tikiwont 09:42, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

Motorola V276

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable cellular phone. This product isn't notable; it's just another incarnation of a common object with no discerning features, no sustaining influence on the market or design, and little longevity. Doesn't meet WP:PRODUCT. Article is unlikely to be repaired because of the lack of substantial sources for this product. Prod was deleted without comment by User:Monnitewars, an account that was recently banned for sockpuppetry. Mikeblas 21:44, 22 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:PRODUCT. STORMTRACKER   94  21:50, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete: Per above, non notable product. And a sidenote, Mikeblas, I am glad somebody is finally tackling these stupid cell-phone articles. - Rjd0060 23:38, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not a catalog. Edison 02:57, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as per WP:NOT and WP:PRODUCT. The article is written like a sales catalogue.  Tbo 157   (talk)  18:12, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, there seems to be plenty of other articles about types of phones. I know WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS, but there would probably have been more AFDs like this before if there was a consensus to get rid of them. Perhaps we should try merging them. Stifle (talk) 21:07, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment. There have been plenty of prods an AfDs on phones. You're voting Keep, then, not only because of WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS, but because you're not paying attention? -- Mikeblas 13:10, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. Is the nominator joking? What harm is this article doing? THE KING 15:51, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment: Please consider WP:HARMLESS and its relevance to your contribution. Stifle (talk) 09:43, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment. I'm not joking. Product-cruft is a serious threat to Wikipedia's credibility. -- Mikeblas 13:11, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Nothing inherently notable about this specific phone. DMcMPO11AAUK/Talk/Contribs 08:07, 27 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.