Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mott (live oak) (2nd nomination)


 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


 * The result of the discussion was: delete. Angus McLellan  (Talk) 14:55, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Mott (live oak)
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

absolutely non notable article, due to the fact that it is a neologism not in common or even colloquial use. It should be deleted since it is a dictionary definition and cannot be expanded into a real article. It is a non-notable Bushism. Nominated once before with the result of Transwiki, but the entry was deleted on Wiktionary and for some odd reason not deleted from Wikipedia. MY♥IN chile 06:57, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment This is borderline G6 (routine maintenance includes cleanup after a transwiki). Note that the definition appears in mott, which is probably sufficient. --Dhartung | Talk 18:58, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, this is essentially fit for a dictionary at most, not an encyclopedia.--Boffob (talk) 06:55, 24 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.