Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moultrie Courthouse


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Akirn (talk) previously User:Icewedge 21:54, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

Moultrie Courthouse

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Nothing notable about this building. &mdash; Timneu22 · talk 19:22, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Sources already cited indicated in the article, and a cursory google search, turns up gobs of good info on the courthouse specifically. Regardless of the problems with other articles which may or may not have been created and/or edited by some editors, this one article appears to meet inclusion criteria with flying colors.  -- Jayron  32  01:32, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per Jayron32. The article creator might have created some dogs for personal reasons, but that doesn't mean we have to delete inclusion-worthy articles like this one too.--Oakshade (talk) 04:58, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per Jayron32. NtheP (talk) 11:54, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:50, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:50, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per Jayron 32 and the obvious notability shown by the sources in the article. --Mkativerata (talk) 19:43, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - major Federal courthouses are almost always considered notable. In this case, a bad editor can make good edits; for "even a broken clock gives the correct time twice a day." Bearian (talk) 19:59, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per guideline supported arguments toward notability.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 08:44, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.