Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mount Carmel School Hazaribagh


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. (non-admin closure)  Ya  sh  !   17:58, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Mount Carmel School Hazaribagh

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No references, barely any stats, empty infobox and WP:NSCHOOL. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 06:45, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. FallingGravity 07:25, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. FallingGravity 07:26, 5 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep. All secondary schools are notable. See this reference: http://www.icbse.com/schools/carmel-balika-vidyalaya/jh077  Evidently the school has changed its name more than once. Eastmain (talk • contribs)  13:39, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Keep it makes them feel special 2607:FB90:54AC:AF3F:BF6A:7A1D:33E4:10F7 (talk) 22:47, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep as a secondary school per longstanding precedent and consensus. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:38, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment: that's not what the guideline says,, . This is: WP:NSCHOOL. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 20:27, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Consensus has long been that all secondary schools are notable. Virtually no secondary school has been deleted at AfD for years. That's consensus. See WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. -- Necrothesp (talk) 08:03, 8 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep: We here at afd go by consensus based on policy and guidelines. But when it comes to schools, WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES, an essay overrides the guideline, WP:NSCHOOL. Seems like it is a never-ending loophope (with this one being saved, will make the case of precedent strong by one more pile). Never seen a school article deleted, so it should not as well forms a weak argument but that is it. May be it is one positive outcome of WP:Systemic bias. Anup   [Talk]  17:04, 11 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.