Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mount Majura Solar Farm


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Majura (district). Apparently no prejudice against recreation should its situation substantially situation change. slakr \ talk / 06:24, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

Mount Majura Solar Farm

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Page is purely speculation, based on a 2013 Development proposal. I have searched for updated sources, but the most recent articles seem to be from April 2013, with none giving any indication the project has been approved. Article is essentially WP:CRYSTALBALL and lacks notability through detailed coverage beyond local news reports in The Canberra Times and a minor note about an objection from Canberra Airport as the site is directly under flight path. I would support a selective merge to mention the proposal as part of the article Majura Parkway as the road construction has made the land available. Dfadden (talk) 07:43, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Dfadden (talk) 07:52, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:16, 28 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment. The article does not have enough information to keep it on wikipedia. So I suggest deletion of the article unless it is expanded by others. Unatnas1986 (talk) 15:17, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Salvio Let's talk about it! 12:24, 10 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Redirect. When this was first reported there was no reason to believe it was not a serious proposal, but no mention has been made of it for months. I suggest it be redirected to Majura (district) and possibly be recreated if it precedes.--Grahame (talk) 00:45, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Agree with Grahamec - if it ever actually gets approved and built, then maybe that would be a time to have an article. hamiltonstone (talk) 00:35, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.