Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mount Pearl Hindu Temple (St.Johns, Newfoundland)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Renamed to Mount Pearl Hindu Temple. BanyanTree 10:06, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Mount Pearl Hindu Temple (St.Johns, Newfoundland)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)


 * Was speedy-delete-tagged, but seems to have possibilities to me. (I renamed it from Hindu Temple (Krishna).) Anthony Appleyard (talk) 18:54, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Doesn't appear to be notable. JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 19:09, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.   -- Fabrictramp (talk) 22:37, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions.   -- Fabrictramp (talk) 22:37, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. Are the textbook citations in the article enough to establish notability? --Eastmain (talk) 23:45, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. It sounds to me like it is notable within the local community, at least, and the references provided have verified some wider notability. (But rename to Mount Pearl Hindu Temple, unless there's some reason to believe there's more than one organization by that name.) --Russ (talk) 16:16, 7 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Black Kite 22:44, 15 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. Non-notable, there are many temples, churches, ashrams in thousands of communities around the world that may be known in their community, but it doesn't make them notable for an encyclopedia. Renee (talk) 01:11, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete The face that it is a temple with some coverage is not enough to make it notable. There will be too many temples around the world that would fulfil that criteria. GizzaDiscuss  &#169; 10:47, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. This one is special because of the references. Notability has been established through the references. The fact that one temple is notable does not mean that others will be automatically – notability must be established in each case, so "there are too many temples around the world that would fulfill that criteria" shouldn't be a problem. --Eastmain (talk) 18:48, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Important to the history of the Hindu community in Newfoundland and therefore notable. Reggie Perrin (talk) 18:17, 18 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.