Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mount Vernon City Council


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Mount Vernon, New York. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 05:10, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Mount Vernon City Council

 * – ( View AfD View log )

City council of a midsized suburb (under 70,000) does not not meet WP:ORGCRITE or WP:GNG. If no consensus to delete, open to a redirect to Mount Vernon, New York. KidAd •  SPEAK  22:33, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:35, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:35, 7 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Merge/Redirect to Mount Vernon, New York. If in the incredibly unlikely case we keep this article on the city council of a small community smooshed right against the northside of the Bronx, it should be renamed to Mount Vernon, New York City Council since Mount Vernon itself is not an article on the "city" in New York State.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:04, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep This is considered the 8th largest city in New York State with a an estimated population of 67,896 (2019). Its neighboring city Yonkers, New York has a similar page Yonkers City Council. johnqarlo (talk) 22:05, 10 March 2021 (EST)
 * The 8th largest city in New York State is not a significant statistic. Avoid WP:OTHERSTUFF. KidAd  •  SPEAK  03:36, 11 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Mount Vernon, New York. I would vote merge, except it seems all the information is already at Mount Vernon, New York. There isn't enough coverage to justify a separate article. power~enwiki ( π,  ν ) 19:00, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Mount Vernon, New York. Unnecessary CFORK of content that exists at the target. Keeping the article just increases maintenance/updating, with no benefit. Nothing really to merge, but if someone wants to merge anything properly sourced, no objection.  // Timothy :: talk  13:52, 13 March 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.