Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mountain Industrial Boulevard


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Lankiveil (speak to me) 08:02, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Mountain Industrial Boulevard

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article shows no notability as to why it should exist. Allen (Morriswa) (talk) 11:23, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:36, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:36, 19 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep A Google News search shows plenty of coverage in reliable independent sources. Candleabracadabra (talk) 13:19, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not at all notable. -- Necrothesp (talk) 09:23, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 02:04, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 03:12, 5 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Merge and Redirect to US 78 freeway, as it overlaps with that freeway. There are Google news items that mention the road, but I didn't see any that were about the road itself; perhaps I've missed something. If not, the road seems to fail the threshold for notability. But freeways are generally notable and this is a reasonable search term. Thus a merge of minimal summary info and redirect is warranted. --Mark viking (talk) 06:52, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. There is no overlap with the US-78 freeway, just an interchange; we don't make redirects for routes that simply intersect with a notable route. Coverage here appears to be routine coverage, nothing that makes this non-freeway, non-state or -national-numbered road notable. - The Bushranger One ping only 23:05, 10 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Question: you used the plural 'we'; is the assertion of an interchange not being enough of an overlap to justify a redirect policy somewhere? I didn't see anything at WikiProject Highways or WP:ROADOUTCOMES, though confess I have not yet read all the associated pages. Thanks, --Mark viking (talk) 23:34, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
 * It's WP:COMMONSENSE and based on my observation of other road articles. An interchange is not an overlap, at all. Otherwise we could redirect Lantana Road, for instance, to Interstate 95 in Florida. An "overlap" in road terms is a concurrency, aka "multiplex". - The Bushranger One ping only 18:05, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.