Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mountain view chocolate factory


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Google. Nja 247 08:27, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Mountain view chocolate factory

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable neologism coined by one specific website. Lacks reliable sources to establish notability. tedder (talk) 10:53, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  -- tedder (talk) 10:54, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions.  -- tedder (talk) 10:54, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  -- tedder (talk) 10:54, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. Mountain View Chocolate Factory is a nickname for Google.  Neologism coined by one writer on The Register.  Any substance here would belong at Criticism of Google. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:14, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Greg Tyler (t &bull; c) 17:22, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Google per R from other name a la Chipzilla. The Register likes to make up such nicknames and use them consistently, and they often stick and are adopted elsewhere.  Redirects are cheap, even if this clearly doesn't merit its own article. Jclemens (talk) 03:11, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Google per Jclemens and Smerdis of Tlön. — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  23:10, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Google per Jclemens. Cnilep (talk) 20:47, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.