Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mountbatten Square


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Yunshui 雲 &zwj; 水  08:30, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Mountbatten Square

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unclear thingy (is it an office building or a shopping mall) without any sources or indication of notability. Quick look at google reveals no independent reliable sources, only directories. Fails WP:GNG The Banner talk 18:47, 9 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete I can see no inherent notability in a building unless it has some assertion of, for example, architectural significance. This one has none. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 20:07, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. CSD A7 doesn't allow for fast-tracked deletion of buildings that fail to even assert a claim to notability.  But that doesn't make the end result any different, just the amount of time to get there.  I can find nothing that indicates this is anything more than just another office building. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 22:51, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per Squeamish Ossifrage. No assertion of notability, probably because there isn't any. Automatic  Strikeout  23:44, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:58, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:58, 10 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. There's no indication that this building is either culturally or historically significant. It's completely without sources. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of articles on buildings. -- xanchester  (t)  22:36, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:MILL. Bearian (talk) 22:24, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete as lacking coverage. Stuartyeates (talk) 04:59, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.