Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mountmellick Athletic Club


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 03:34, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

Mountmellick Athletic Club

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

No evidence of notability (found little reliable coverage under the GNG, and clubs are not covered under the sports guideline) Quadrantal (talk) 02:03, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sport of athletics-related deletion discussions. Quadrantal (talk) 02:03, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete as nom. Quadrantal (talk) 02:06, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Ireland.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  03:31, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: Per nom. Fails GNG. There are a few trivial mentions in the local newspapers but no significant coverage at all. The original creator probably had some sort of undisclosed COI with the subject since they have only ever made edits to this article.  C F A   💬  22:29, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Mountmellick. As an ATD. Or, failing that, simply delete. As has been noted, and while I could find and have added a number of pieces of coverage from the local Leinster Leader paper, it is all ROTM coverage of the club's activities (of a type might expect for any local club in the local newspaper; Anywhere on the planet). I can find nothing to indicate independent notability. Under WP:GNG or WP:CLUB. (While the "one of oldest clubs in Ireland" claim might contribute to notability, I can find no independent/reliable source to establish the claimed 1870s foundation date. Nor is there anything to support the text about performance in national competitions.) That we don't have reliable/independent/verifiable sources to establish some of the basics (foundation/disestablishment/etc) indicates that there hasn't been the "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" expected by GNG. Guliolopez (talk) 11:33, 11 July 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.