Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mousam River


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Nomination withdrawn per rewriting of the article that replaced an irrelevant rant with relevant basic information. Non-admin closure. --Blanchardb- Me • MyEars • MyMouth -timed 19:14, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Mousam River

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Unsourced coatrack article about water pollution. No indication of where this river is located. Delete. Blanchardb- Me • MyEars • MyMouth -timed 14:08, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete per nom: multiple problems. ♥ Shapiros10 Wuz  Here ♥ 14:59, 14 April 2008 (UTC) Keep Can I change my vote? The rewrite would be good as a stub. ♥ Shapiros10 Wuz  Here ♥ 19:12, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Mizu onna sango15 / 水 女 珊瑚15  15:20, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Apparently, it's in Maine. Aren't rivers generally considered inherently notable? If so, reduce to a stub and keep. Zagalejo^^^ 18:15, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment It is a real river in southern Maine. (See List_of_Maine_rivers)  The best thing would be for someone to rewrite as a stub on the actual river.  But if no one gets the chance to do that any deletion should be without predjudice to recreation as a proper geographical article.--Cube lurker (talk) 18:19, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I rewrote the article as a very bare-bones stub. I don't know much about rivers, so if someone more knowledgble can add some info, that would be great. Zagalejo^^^ 18:29, 14 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.