Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mouse Run


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ☺ ·   Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  18:27, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Mouse Run

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) It had no meaningful hits in a video game reliable sources custom Google search. There are no worthwhile redirect targets. If someone finds more (non-English and offline) sources, please ping me. – czar   01:39, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - While the game has existed for a while, it's basically been 'off the radar screen', and I also don't see particular notability. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 01:58, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 02:09, 31 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete no coverage in reliable sources. The program only has 1,383 lifetime downloads. Antrocent (&#9835;&#9836;) 03:04, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:04, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:04, 4 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. Lacks reliable independent secondary sources to establish notability as required by WP:GNG.  That's really all that matters at AfD.  Msnicki (talk) 04:09, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - Software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. A search turned up no significant WP:RS coverage.Dialectric (talk) 04:18, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as my searches found nothing at all to suggest improvement. SwisterTwister   talk  06:04, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment - This is a 'snow delete' kind of situation, so an admin should be able to just come in and take care of things right now. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 14:48, 5 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.