Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moustafa Gadalla


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. BJ Talk 00:46, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Moustafa Gadalla
Likely non-notable. Very cranky "Egyptologist" whose qualifications are in a completely different field and whose books are all self-published. No actual assertion of notability here, and Google Scholar gives nothing. Moreschi (talk) 22:52, 5 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete: Where are third-party sources? Alexius08 (talk) 04:25, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete:I'm normally an anti-deletionist, but there's no way to independently validate the article. Looie496 (talk) 06:25, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: Fails WP:BIO and WP:PROF. No independent, third-party sources demonstrating notability. MastCell Talk 17:20, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per MastCell. VG &#x260E; 21:04, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  21:24, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  21:24, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Self-published fringe theorist.  Sources are self-published and there's not indication of notability. Edward321 (talk) 22:58, 7 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.