Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Move Closer to Your World (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 04:58, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

Move Closer to Your World
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

This page was recently nominated for AfD, but the nomination was closed as "moot" due to sockpuppetry. The article itself is about a television news music theme which has reportedly been used by various television stations. However, the article is predominantly unsourced, and several of the sources are personal or fan-type pages which would not normally be considered reliable sources. The article also appears to violate copyright by including the entire lyric to the theme song. Metropolitan90 (talk) 13:16, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  —Metropolitan90 (talk) 13:24, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  —Metropolitan90 (talk) 13:24, 4 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep Google Books and other searches convince me that the topic is notable, and thus an article about it could exist; e.g.    . It seems to have been used for many years, on many TV stations, so I think it's notable. The 'copyvio' is a non-issue here; just remove it. Ditto for the trivia and unreferenced junk. But I think it's quite possible to fix this via normal editing, rather than deletion.  Chzz  ►  13:28, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - As discussed ad nauseum (so I won't repeat the details), the song has been recorded by numerous notable groups and has independent reliable coverage in several textbooks to demonstrate notability. Sources related to the song (for info, but not notability), such as the production companies and stations, can be used to fill in a few details. - SummerPhD (talk) 14:45, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep This source certainly seems to indicate that this is notable. Qrsdogg (talk) 16:30, 7 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep - My position from the first AFD remains unchanged. -- Whpq (talk) 16:37, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.