Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Move with You (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 22:18, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Move with You
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This disambiguation page was created after the previous AfD ended, even though the possibility of diambiguating was discussed then. As a disambiguation page, there are links to two articles where this title isn't mentioned in one and barely so in the other (the first single from an album that has yet to be released?). Neither would survive an AfD on its own (one didn't), so not sure why as a disambiguation page it's ok. Star cheers peaks news lost wars Talk to me 01:27, 4 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete per CSD G4. 2 links isn't enough for a disambiguation page. Snowager (talk) 02:38, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
 * , if you've changed your mind, please edit your vote. Thanks! De Guerre (talk) 02:20, 6 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep, 2 links is enough for a dab, see WP:2DABS and 1000s of existing, valid dabs. , the term is mentioned in both articles now, so both entries meet MOS:DABMENTION. Nothing to be gained from deletion, potentially WP:USEFUL. If there was only one, it would be a redirect (as neither meets WP:NSONG or WP:GNG); as there are 2, it should be a dab. Boleyn (talk) 09:50, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep: each would be a valid redirect, neither is clearly primary topic, so a dab page is appropriate. And yes, two links is enough for a valid dab page where neither is clearly the primary topic. Pam  D  10:19, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:38, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:38, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Okay, I guess we'll keep it. I've learned from Boleyn's comment. Snowager (talk) 00:35, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep as creator. took the words right out of my mouth.--  Laun  chba  ller  17:30, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Snow keep per Boleyn and PamD. De Guerre (talk) 02:20, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.