Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Movement EP


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was  keep. Non-admin closure.  Jujutacular  T · C 21:07, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

Movement EP

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Self released EPs. No secondary sources found. Second one is sourced only to an unreliable fansite. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 01:04, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:35, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep the Reason EP - Allmusic Review. Further (brief) coverage from Dallas Morning News, and CNET describing it as a "career changing EP". Less found for the Movement EP, but it could be argued that the band are sufficiently notable that all of their releases merit articles.--Michig (talk) 15:19, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
 * That would be a WP:INHERITED argument, but I will grant that the Allmusic coverage is a start. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 15:29, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
 * No, just common sense.--Michig (talk) 16:12, 2 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep Reason EP was originally released on an independant label but was re-released in 2007. It was not self-released. It has a page on amazon.com and was where the fray first gained recognition for their work. The Fray are also a notable band and this ep is featured in there discography page and as such should have a page of its own —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shoalla (talk • contribs) 07:49, 3 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep - Both should be kept. There are plenty of arguments to support for the Reason EP; it was the EP that got them signed, that won them fame in Denver, that eventually impressed Mike Flynn and got the band signed. As for Movement, it is part of the band's catalog; it is included in their discography; it was the first release of a band that later went big. There really seems no reason to delete it. Steed Asprey - 171 (talk) 14:11, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I have added info about the impact and reception of the EP. It is no longer a stub; it has multiple sources; it no longer warrants any deletion. Steed Asprey - 171 (talk) 14:55, 8 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep - Both the EP's must be kept. I agree with the above statements in favor of keeping both. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Prince Imrahil (talk • contribs) 15:10, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per above comments.  Mr. C.C. Hey yo!I didn't do it! 18:35, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.