Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Movement for Compassionate Living


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  08:19, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

Movement for Compassionate Living

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Unconvinced of a WP:GNG or WP:NORG pass. I did a fair amount of WP:BEFORE, including through paywalled archival searches, which turned up mirrors, simple listings, the organisation discussing itself, and a one-line mention in Green Consumerism (2011) by Juliana Mansvelt. Tagged for notability since December 2016. Vaticidalprophet 04:53, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. Vaticidalprophet 04:53, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Vaticidalprophet 04:53, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:00, 22 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete - I'm finding nothing but occasional trivial mentions, which of course are inadequate under the intentionally strict WP:NORG standard. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 18:29, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Wikipedia is not the yellow pages. --SilverTiger12 (talk) 01:03, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:NORG. Wareon (talk) 05:20, 27 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.