Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Movers

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE as copyvio at 03:19, 8 Jan 2005 by User:Infrogmation (who forgot to close the discussion)

Movers
This might well be a valid topic, I don't know, it's so poorly written it's hard to tell. I don't think articles should start out this bad. When someone wants to contribute one good sentence on this subject they can start a new stub from scratch. ike9898 23:40, Dec 27, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete, it's an ad. Reads like a company PR release.  This moving company may or may not be notable enough to warrant a page, but even if it is, it shouldn't be this page. Shimeru 01:59, Dec 28, 2004 (UTC)
 * Copyvio from . Delete. hfool 02:22, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Now listed as a copyvio. Will probably be deleted by this process in 7 days.ike9898 16:19, Dec 28, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete as link spam; a previous spam at Movers from the same outfit (mover4u.com) was deleted within the last week, though it had completely different text, so it can't really be speedily delted as a repost. It had been marked as a candidate for speedy on 8 December and was deleted on 23 December (which isn't exactly speedy).
 * Delete There might one day be a valid article called Movers, this is not it. Shred' it. Phils 19:34, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.