Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Movie Filler


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete Nandesuka 14:26, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Movie Filler


The term "movie filler" is not commonly used in that sense. As one can see through the discussion on the talk page, the article was written by the owner of the moviefiller website. I do believe that he acted in good faith but it is simply misleading to tell Wikipedia readers that this is a standard use. (Extra note: I believe that this is not quite speediable. I originally used a prod tag which was removed by the author, see talk page) Pascal.Tesson 19:17, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as G11. While I believe the author is being honest on the article's talk page, he should be aware of WP:COI.  Moreover, looked at objectively, the article is clearly just here to promote the website.  In any event, it fails WP:NEO. JChap2007 19:48, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete unless verified by reliable sources. - Mailer Diablo 14:47, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NEO (the definition of the phrase presented), WP:WEB (the website discussed), and WP:NOT (the list of films). That leaves nothing else, so the whole article should probably be deleted.  Only about 5000 Ghits for the phrase "movie filler", so I don't think that it is in general use to describe something else that this article could be rewritten about.  Too bad; I really thought that there might be something salvageable here.  Heather 00:45, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.