Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Movie Star Planet


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Secret account 07:31, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Movie Star Planet

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Seems to read as an advertisement; not very encyclopedic. The Suave  20:06, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
 * non voting comment from reviewing admin. I declined the speedy deletion though there is no assertion of significance in this iteration. A better version was deleted as G11, which at least did assert significance. There are sufficient g-coverage links that rescue may be possible. That is the crux of the matter-- whether or not subject is notable. Let the afd ride. Dloh cierekim  20:34, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. A Google search for ("movie star planet") yielded primarily their own website, a hatful of YouTube videos, a bunch of blog entries, and a boatload of wiki.answers.com links and the like.  I tried finding better coverage by Googling ("movie star planet" review), and found nothing like in-depth independent coverage; however, there was a release from the Advertising Self-Regulatory Council, apparently a tentacle of the Better Business Bureaus, expressing concern about security of information submitted by children.  I followed this up by Googling ("movie star planet" privacy) and ("movie star planet" security), hoping to find articles in the media about the matter; but got nothing more substantial than another link to the ASRC release.  Appears to fail WP:GNG.  Ammodramus (talk) 17:54, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 04:06, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:06, 19 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LlamaAl (talk) 00:01, 20 February 2013 (UTC)




 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.