Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Movieguide Epiphany Prize for Most Inspiring Movie


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 04:52, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

Movieguide Epiphany Prize for Most Inspiring Movie

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Weird partisan award that reviews movies "from a christian perspective" with no coverage aside from that which it generates itself. BrigadierG (talk) 00:25, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete - Non-notable. I came up with no coverage beyond the cursory.
 * Weak keep per RunningTiger123 and a few column inches in the  LA Times in 1996. JSFarman (talk) 00:51, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Awards. SL93 (talk) 00:45, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. SL93 (talk) 00:46, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep – the awards are covered in industry publications such as Variety, The Hollywood Reporter, and Deadline. Based on practices for other awards, once the overall awards are established as notable and have run for a few years, individual category lists such as this are acceptable (especially since the listed films mostly have their own articles, fulfilling a navigational purpose as well). RunningTiger123 (talk) 01:48, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep - As others have noted, there's some press coverage, if not much. But even if there weren't, notability isn't proportional to coverage.  The moral implications of the culture is a huge issue, and this award is the biggest thing I know of that deals with that.  It's true that it's partisan, and that's a reason to provide a counterpoint, but it isn't a reason to suppress information about it.  That would be far more partisan than the award is. - Burner89751654 (talk) 13:47, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep as a valid split from the main article and has reliable sources coverage such as Variety, Deadline, and Hollywood Reporter, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 18:34, 26 May 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.