Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MoviesPlanet.com


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 07:17, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

MoviesPlanet.com
Spam Gjjjj 16:23, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

See also: Articles for deletion/Roi Sorezki
 * How can it be spam if I didn't even put a link in there? :) --Sorezki 16:25, 22 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete It's spam because it is an article created solely to promote the website (whose URL is the article title). It should be deleted because the site is not notable (Alexa rank below 5.3 million). NawlinWiki 16:45, 22 August 2006 (UTC)


 * It's only the name of the site. How would you call this page: Matchmaker.com ? --Sorezki 17:01, 22 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Strong Delete: Even though your intentions were good Gjjjj, you really need to cite Policies and guidelines in your nominations. For example, MoviesPlanet.com Fails: Notability (web) because it has not been referenced by 3rd party sources and the site's content is nothing but warez (pirated movies) — a huge no-no for legal reasons. --  Netsnipe  (Talk)  17:06, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: "Managment: Roi Sorezki (Sorezki) Founder & CEO" . That's a blatant breach of our Spam policy and Vanity guidelines on commerical self-promotion. You are only notable when someone else in the press is writing about you and not when you decide to write about yourself. --  Netsnipe  (Talk)  17:09, 22 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:WEB. Haakon 17:19, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete for WP:WEB and WP:SPAM -- Whpq 17:58, 22 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete - Commercial content for obvious reasons. -- AQu01rius 18:38, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete, spam for a remarkably non-notable site --- Deville (Talk) 03:40, 23 August 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.