Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Movies that feature people bleeding from their eyes


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mind matrix  00:44, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

Movies that feature people bleeding from their eyes
List of examples of an arbitrarily-selected entertainment medium featuring people with an arbitrary consequence of injury to an arbitrary body part. Some of which are deliberate, while others just happen to be to that body part. WP:ISNOT an indiscriminate collection of information. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] AfD? 17:27, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. PJM 17:33, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom.    Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk  18:12, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. I get the feeling someone is playing with WP:POINT here. 23skidoo 18:22, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per nom. Agnte 18:26, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as per above, although it is funny. --Agamemnon2 19:11, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. That list makes me bleed from my eyes. Flyboy Will 19:20, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete and BJAODN. Kinda funny concept, but it really isn't worthy of a page.  --Thephotoman 21:59, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep. Eye mutilation and bleeding have been important in cinematic and art history since Un Chien Andalou. Nothing wrong with this list, which has potential scholarly use. -- JJay 08:43, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete totally unmaintainable.Gateman1997 19:41, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
 * In what way? This is not a pet cat, it's a list. -- JJay 19:45, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Do you feel the need to comment on most of my votes?Gateman1997 21:05, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Many of them clearly deserve comment. However, I apologize for interrupting your important work here at wikipedia. -- JJay 21:19, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
 * None of them deserve any comment from you and it is no longer welcome. Please cease this stalking campaign now.Gateman1997 21:25, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Relax and have a nice day. -- JJay 21:44, 19 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Strong Keep interesting and easily verifiable.  Grue   15:32, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
 * BJAODN daft listcruft. Stifle 00:06, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete come onnnnnnnnnnnnn....Paul 18:04, 24 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.