Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moving Tales


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  20:43, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

Moving Tales

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable. Unreferenced since 2011. Fuddle (talk) 13:32, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

Some good sources including New York Times and New Yorker. Moving Tales were early producers of interactive storytelling so worth considering. — Preceding unsigned comment added by YoJimboJames (talk • contribs) 14:24, 4 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Fuddle (talk) 13:32, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 13:43, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 13:43, 4 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete ahh, I was planning to nominate this for AFD today, but I see Fuddle beat me to it. There are indeed some good sources like the NYT, the New Yorker and Kirkus, but they're not about the company, they're about one of the company's books:  The book is probably notable; the company is not, as there is no in-depth coverage of it and notability is WP:NOTINHERITED. The author of the article is a single-purpose account who since 2011 has done nothing but try to publish articles related to Matthew-Talbot Kelly. Spicy (talk) 14:53, 4 June 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.