Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moxie Raia (3rd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. per SK1 - Clearly wasting my fucking time so fuck it wrapping up as Keep, (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 23:48, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Moxie Raia
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non notable singer/songwriter, Article was deleted in 2014 and 2015 due to notability concerns and I'm not seeing anything different now - Fails NMUSIC 7 GNG,

I originally CSD'd but as suggested redirect (which I personally think is pointless) I'm sending the article here so gain a better discussion, Thanks, – Davey 2010 Talk 14:14, 6 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep - Agree with your comments, . I did check out the deletion history before creating this page. It was last attempted to create in August 2015, and yes, at that point the person in question was not notable, I agree. However, if you look at the sources now, which are notably published post-August 2015 (and mostly in 2016), they talk substantially about her. For example, there's a semi-detailed bio on the iTunes bio page here, followed by a list of her songs. Next, a pretty detailed feature about the person has been covered on the third-party, quite reliable source of Vice magazine here; published in March 2016 . Also, the chart history of one of the singer's songs on Billboard here, which I believe, satisfies WP:BAND pt. 2 ( Kanye collaborating with Desiigner? ); published in March 2016 . Next, she is one of the opening acts in the upcoming tour of another popular singer and has been covered widely here and here; published in March 2016 . Speculative, right? I know, but can this be considered? Next, Rolling Stone included her in a list of upcoming hot artists to watch out for here; published in March 2016 . Basis of all these sources, which were all published after the article on the said personality was attempted for creation, makes me believe that this article should stay. The link rot issue can be tackled in minutes later. Please consider this. Thanks, Nairspecht   Converse  14:44, 6 May 2016 (UTC)


 * I have basically compared the availability of sources above, between the last time the article was created and now. Moving forward, about the notability, it is covered in some reliable and verifiable third-party sources and does look notable. Also, searching on search engines for the said personalities throws up high quality links. Please consider keeping the article. Best, Nairspecht   Converse  16:04, 6 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The link rot issue has now been solved. However, I make no comment is to whether this article should stay or go. - Derek R Bullamore (talk) 14:50, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Much appreciated, mate. Nairspecht   Converse  16:06, 6 May 2016 (UTC)


 *  Keep or redirect - The article now contains a few reliable sources. If it cannot be kept, it can be redirected to Freddy_Wexler Freddy_Wexler. --Jax 0677 (talk) 16:00, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
 * That doesn't make sense to me, dear . Nairspecht   Converse  16:05, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
 *  Reply -, Moxie Raia's name is listed in that section. --Jax 0677 (talk) 16:10, 6 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep: Perhaps she wasn't notable before, but she's crossed over since.  In 2011 I remember Articles for deletion/Andy Grammer wasn't a slam dunk, now I can't avoid that song Honey, I'm Good. any harder.--Milowent • hasspoken  18:40, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep Whatever happened in previous AfDs, she crosses the line of notability based on the reliable and verifiable sources provided. Alansohn (talk) 23:27, 6 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.