Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moxietype


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Oops, first hit the relist button by mistake Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:36, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

Moxietype

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No independent coverage. FuFoFuEd (talk) 06:46, 27 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. No independent secondary sources to establish notability per WP:GNG or WP:CORPDEPTH.  Msnicki (talk) 13:00, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 23:32, 27 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - unreferenced, no indication of notability. Dialectric (talk) 13:53, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Looks like it fails the WP:GNG. Qrsdogg (talk) 19:28, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:36, 4 June 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.