Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moyo Studios


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 00:59, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

Moyo Studios

 * – ( View AfD View log )

A game agency which appears to fail WP:CORP. They apparently created a game which may have some notability on its own, but that in no way makes the agency notable by itself. I was going to prod it but it went thru CSD already, so it was ineligible. Rymatz (talk) 16:33, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions.  — I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 16:45, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:16, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 23:17, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 23:17, 21 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Speedy deletion nomination doesn't preculde a Proposed deletion :) Doesn't matter now, but you know for next time. Marasmusine (talk) 08:30, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:31, 28 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - A small company, with virtually no independent sources that discuss or analyze the company. Does not meet the Notability (organizations and companies) requirement.  The vast majority google hits are social networking or promotional material.  As far as I can tell, none of the games they have had a role in producing is notable enough for an article, either. --Noleander (talk) 01:01, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per lack of notable third-party sources, media coverage in general. Both a Google and Yahoo! only found Twitter, Yelp, Linkedin, Flickr, and company's website. Those sources don't spell notable. SwisterTwister   talk  23:46, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.