Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mozamil Ahmad


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete by  at 02:49, 15 October 2010 per G3(blatant hoax or misinformation). (NAC) Armbrust  Talk  Contribs  11:59, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

Mozamil Ahmad



 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Disputed prod. Given the complete lack of verifiable sources, I strongly suspect this is a hoax article. I find it difficult to believe that there would be absolutely nothing on the web about this person if the claims made in the article were true. OhNo itsJamie Talk 14:56, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
 * It's a hoax. Previous contributions by this person, including Juth Nean and Juthiasm, have been hoaxes, for starters.  The first cited book, purportedly published by the OUP, is not in the OUP's WWW catalogue.  The other book citations are just smokescreens.  The article is plainly rubbish on its face, too.  Camels were not first domesticated in the 16th century.  That's off by about four thousand years, by most estimates.  And the correct name to drop in the early study of the comparative anatomy of camels is Luigi Lombardini, who published Ricerche sui Cammelli in 1879.  Delete.  Uncle G (talk) 19:02, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
 * No sources, the image is not of the subject, history of the editor all points to this being a hoax. SQGibbon (talk) 19:50, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.