Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mozart Clarinet Concerto in A, K. 622 Arranged for Two Clarinets by Tale Ognenovski (album)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The arguments favoring deletion are policy/guideline based. IMO the sole argument for merge/redirect does not adequately respond to the points made in the pro-deletion comments. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:29, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Mozart Clarinet Concerto in A, K. 622 Arranged for Two Clarinets by Tale Ognenovski (album)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not a notable musical recording. References appear to be self-published or to things like iTunes. power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 06:29, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NALBUM. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 09:55, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:49, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Baby miss fortune 03:39, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:54, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:27, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. I think this would justify speedy delete as promotional. It's a straight advertisement.  DGG ( talk ) 02:57, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Smerge and Redirect to Tale Ognenovski. It is appropriately covered there.  That article is getting large, a spinout may be justified.  Spinning out Tale_Ognenovski would be more appropriate than spinnout out individual recompositions of mozart, for example.  It is already tagged for cleanup.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:17, 13 December 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.