Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mporia (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 22:10, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Mporia
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable. GeorgeLouis (talk) 05:10, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
 * It would help if you stated why they're not notable. Some of the sources in the prior AfD suggest they may be. Luke no 94  (tell Luke off here) 10:34, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:35, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:35, 28 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. While a prior AfD that resulted in default to keep probably precludes speedy deletion, the current text would appear to qualify for speedy deletion both as unambiguous advertising and no minimal claim of importance; having a deal with Verizon does not qualify as such: a technology provider of mobile commerce solutions. The company builds and markets M-Commerce stores for retailers and service providers, enabling them to extend their reach to the mobile channel and drive consumer sales.  The larger problem is that this text is also too vague to improve by editing as well.  And it's a behind the scenes business selling other businesses means to sell stuff to people with fancier mobile telephones than mine.  Absent some kind of showing of significant impact on history, technology, or culture, this kind of business just won't ever be an appropriate subject for a standalone article in an encyclopedia.  - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 19:26, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 19:11, 5 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. Not notable. Dusty |&#x1f4ac;|You can help! 20:58, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.