Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mr. Chewy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:11, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Mr. Chewy

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Not notable, which isn't unusual for a 1 year old company. Two of the sources aren't reliable, the other two are not significant. Since there is no real claim of notability, it is borderline A7, but it won't hurt to wait 7 days to discuss before deleting. Dennis Brown - 2&cent;    &copy;   Join WER 01:43, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - It appears to be unambiguous WP:ARTSPAM. The reliable sources listed only briefly mention Mr. Chewy in passing without giving any useful information about it or confirming its notability (i.e. failing significant coverage). —JmaJeremy  ✆  ✎  19:03, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:15, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:15, 24 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:CORPDEPTH. If the company becomes more notable in the future, an article can be created at that time.  Logical Cowboy (talk) 01:44, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable. Should've A7'd. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iconoclast.horizon (talk • contribs)
 * Delete - Not notable. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 23:32, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.