Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mr. Lambu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep as this is clear enough consensus to at least close a day early (NAC). SwisterTwister  talk  04:57, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Mr. Lambu

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NFILM. The prod tag was removed by the creator Magipur. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 18:13, 24 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep - Good sources. very notable film. Magipur (talk) 18:15, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep Hi I’ve rewritten the lead of this article but was wondering by what criteria a film starring one of India’s most popular actresses, and whose music was composed by an award winning composer, was nominated for deletion? I’m not saying you were wrong for doing so, I just think it would be helpful for this discussion to know this reason. Thanks. Picomtn (talk) 19:24, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note This article has been linked to the filmography sections of both Suraiya and O. P. Nayyar articles where this movie was already referenced. Thanks. Picomtn (talk) 19:38, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I have WP:PRODed this article but since that was removed, I have sent it to AfD instead. The article was tagged for notability by Wgolf with this edit. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 16:35, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi Again please, I'm still not sure why you exactly nominated this article for deletion, and without knowing that I have no idea what kind of improvements you want to see have done to this article. Thanks. Picomtn (talk) 08:31, 28 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep – Film has four solid, notable, wikilinked actors, has three solid sources, a noted screenwriter, and a theme song that has legs into the 21st century. Nominating this film twice without following our deletion polices is a policy violation. Actually 2: WP:BEFORE and WP:ATD. Yes,, those are both policies. Follow the links, scroll up, then scroll back down and read them. Cheers!  12:53, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep Three solid reliable sources is enough to meet WP:GNG. Seems notable enough for an article. Omni Flames   let's talk about it  23:22, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep: Looking at the sources, the subject is surely notable. A Google search, especially for books, brings up many other credible sources to support this. But this article needs to use more sources, as inline citations, and copyediting. Sainsf  &lt;^&gt; Feel at home 02:32, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note I've now added 4 additional book references to this article and was able to document the solo sung in this movie by Lata Mangeshkar too. Thanks. Picomtn (talk) 10:40, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep The film is notable and the article is now well-referenced. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  16:17, 30 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.