Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mr. Laughalot


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was speedied, definitely nonsense. Opabinia regalis 04:30, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

Mr. Laughalot

 * — (View AfD)

I'm pretty confident this is some sort of weird vandalism, but not entirely so. No sources, and the author had edited no other articles. Only good faith stopped me from nominating this for speedy deletion. eaolson 03:59, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

Then what would this be a vandalism of? Is there something wrong with creating an article without editing other articles first? I apologize, I am a new user of Wikipedia. Ultraflame 04:05, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
 * From WP:VAND: "Vandalism is any addition, deletion, or change of content made in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Wikipedia." You've provide no sources or even an explanation of what this entry is for. eaolson 04:11, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - no content whatsoever. CSD A3. So tagged. MER-C 04:14, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete. What part of patent nonsense don't we understand? -- Antepenultimate 04:25, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.