Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mr. Lillig

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. brenneman (t) (c) 11:28, 23 September 2005 (UTC)

Mr. Lillig
I'm not even sure how to describe this. "A reference," says the talk page. A joke/attack page on a teacher or professor would be my call. Unencyclopedic in the extreme. Joyous (talk) 03:22, 17 September 2005 (UTC) It's a reference as how to act in Mr. Lillig's class. It it to help newer students. A waste of space? This is just as much a waste of space as user profiles, yet you all have them. I couldn't understand Mr. Lillig when I first entered his class, now after reading this I can understand him and his quiz format. This is useful for all St. Ignatius students.
 * Speedy delete, it doesn't even make sense.--nixie 03:24, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, speedily if possible in any way. The author appears to mean well, but doesn't understand what an article is meant to be.  See WP:NOT.  Friday (talk) 03:55, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete as non-notable real person, perhaps? Bunchofgrapes 04:21, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-encyclopedic junk. -- PFHLai 04:37, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Articles about the verbal mannerisms of basically unidentified, non-notable people are very far from being encyclopedic. --Metropolitan90 04:38, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete “Very good excellent, class, fan-tastic, no really I'm not being sarcastic” but here is not the space for it. I'd have no objection to it being in a contributing editor's personal sandbox though. Alf melmac 09:02, 17 September 2005 (UTC)

Speedied as per consensus only keep vote was by IP who created page. Jtkiefer T - 19:41, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.