Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mr. Nilsson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to Pippi Longstocking. Liz Read! Talk! 23:02, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

Mr. Nilsson

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

A character from the Pippi Longstocking books. A BEFORE doesn't seem to turn up much directly talking about the character outside of his role in the books, which can be easily covered by the main Pippi Longstocking article. There just doesn't seem to be enough substance here to justify a separate split. Pokelego999 (talk) 20:03, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Literature. Pokelego999 (talk) 20:03, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect Does not have nearly enough SIGCOV, but it could probably be redirected somewhere. QuicoleJR (talk) 20:19, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
 * As nominator, my personal suggestion would be to the Pippi Longstocking article, given that he's discussed as a supporting character there, and there surprisingly isn't an article for the whole series on English Wikipedia. Pokelego999 (talk) 04:37, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Pippi Longstocking. If I remember these stories at all, this character is very much a sidekick to the main character so the redirect to the character is a good option regardless. &mdash;siro&chi;o 04:48, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect seems like a sensible editorial decision. Draken Bowser (talk) 07:17, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Pippi Longstocking: Already mentioned at this target, and provides a decent WP:ATD-R for what can reasonably be seen as a valid search term. - 2pou (talk) 18:35, 27 August 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.