Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mr. Obama, You've Got Mail


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Stifle (talk) 14:49, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

Mr. Obama, You've Got Mail
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

A non-notable books. \ Backslash Forwardslash / (talk) 12:14, 4 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete There are lots of references but nearly all are to the book itself (a primary source) which does not help demonstrate notability. The other references are to bible passages or past speaches.  The article reads like a soapbox RadioFan (talk) 12:17, 4 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Weak Delete per nom  SPLETTE &#32;:]&#32;How's my driving? 18:10, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:10, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Since the article has been improved (reliable references and more appropriate citations from reliable sources have been added) there are no reasons for deletion. Theprop (talk) 08:31, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment There are more references but they have the same problem the original ones did. I'd expect to see references on the movie itself (such as reviews) rather than its subject matter.  They appear to be there to reference the point being by the movie.  Still very soapboxy.--RadioFan (talk) 13:03, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:11, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.  -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:11, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete The book isn't discussed in the news at all, and hasn't impacted the world at all. Only 9 hits on a standard google search about an Obama book says a lot about its notability.  Them  From  Space  02:14, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom, and Google searches of the book don't turn up much aside from the books themseves. Netalarm   talk  03:41, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete is what you've really got. Not mail.  Not exposure.  Not notability.  JBsupreme (talk) 06:24, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - appears to have been posted in the form of a review of the book, complete with reviewer's name listed at the top, rather than an encyclopedia article about it. Could of course be rewritten, but book doesn't seem notable anyway -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 14:19, 11 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete As per nomination; book does not appear to be notable.Simonm223 (talk) 14:44, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.