Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mr. Twinkie


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:34, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

Mr. Twinkie

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

We don't have an article (that I could find) on Color TV (TV series), let alone any indication that a puppet character on that show is notable. Shadowjams (talk) 21:59, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. I could find no proof of notability. Drmies (talk) 22:01, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I have added more information as well as references...I hope that that helps. Thank you. Alibaster6
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:01, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:01, 25 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep - The article has (offline) refs, which indicate notability. Unless we think it's a hoax, or that the user who added them is lying or something.  The article should probably be renamed Color TV, and put all this info in a subsection. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) 04:33, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Except it's about the puppet, not the TV show. A better response would be to "merge" this to the main TV show article, which again, doesn't exist. The fact they're offline isn't a problem per se, but it does probably indicate you haven't actually seen them yourself, so you're just guessing like the rest of us, none of which is particularly encouraging for building a reliable encyclopedia article about this TV program. Shadowjams (talk) 04:36, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
 * That's why I said rename the article. In this case, it's the same as merging to the parent article. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) 05:39, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
 * But there is no parent article. Shadowjams (talk) 05:44, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
 * It will then be the parent article. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) 06:32, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  00:47, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. If I'm reading this correctly, this appears to be about a character on a public access television series, which tends to suggest non-notability. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 05:01, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete: Fails WP:N. Joe Chill (talk) 02:16, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as NN. JBsupreme  ( talk ) ✄ ✄ ✄	 20:16, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.