Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MrBeast videography


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. RL0919 (talk) 21:15, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

MrBeast videography

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. The notability guideline for lists states that for a list to be notable it [needs to be] discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources, and MrBeast's videography as a whole hasn't been discussed by any reliable and independant sources. Besides, an indiscriminate selection of the most viewed videos and all the videos MrBeast has uploaded divorced from any sort of context via words is simply not useful to a reader. —Matrix(!) (a good person!)&#91;Citation not needed at all; thank you very much&#93; 20:33, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Entertainment. —Matrix(!) (a good person!)&#91;Citation not needed at all; thank you very much&#93; 20:33, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete A selected list of "standout videos" is a red-line WP:PROMO violation. Either list all their videos (which his YouTube page already does) or none at all.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 21:20, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:32, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  00:10, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete Only one link has an article, another is just a redirect. Not enough to be a valid navigational list.  Some of his videos have enough media coverage to have articles made for them.  Maybe in the future enough will be made that this list becomes valid.  Any news media covering his videos as a whole, are talking mostly about him.   D r e a m Focus  04:49, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete Too promotional it is. Orientls (talk) 05:26, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: Could be notable but fails to have sources establishing GNG. Most references are primary. Also WP:NOTDIR. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 10:55, 25 February 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.