Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mr Puaz (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. And temporary salt until reliable sources start raining down and wash it off Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:16, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Mr Puaz
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject does not meet the criteria for notability. Searches turn up blogs, Spotify, youtube videos, all of which should not be used as sources. Citation to the Swahillia version of the BBC is the main page of the website. Subject does not meet WP:GNG or WP:CREATIVE. Also note that this article has been deleted for similar reasons before (Articles for deletion/Mr Puaz). SamHolt6 (talk) 17:37, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2017 July 6.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Offline 18:00, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:07, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:07, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:07, 6 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete and salt. No additional sources over deletion discussion two months ago. czar  18:47, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt per nom and Czar - GretLomborg (talk) 18:35, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Still fails WP:GNG. A temporary salt may be a good idea, too.  Anarchyte  ( work  &#124;  talk )  03:06, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - No substantial cover in reliable sources so fails WP:GNG. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:23, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - Probably could have been a WP:G4, as this version is not substantially improved content or source-wise, and its only been just over a month. Also support salting and/or warning the article creator that continuing to do this is considered disruptive and could lead to blocks, as he's created it both times, and participated in the last AFD, so he knows there were problems with it. Sergecross73   msg me  18:59, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - Nominated the first AfD for this article and frankly this "new" iteration has not fixed any of the problems present in the original. Also, I'm not sure if I missed it from the original or it's new information, but the article states that the subject's son is named "Randy Joel", so it looks like a WP:COI case to me. SorryNotSorry ✽ ✉  19:05, 11 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.