Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mr Swingy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Shanel 00:48, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

Mr Swingy
This was originally prodded without comment. It appears to be a neologism and does not meet the criteria for inclusion in Wikipedia. James084 03:38, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Thought I had left a comment, but I don't see it in the history - in any event, this is clearly nonsense, gets about 70 Google hits, including some Wiki mirrors (far too low for a real pop culture term). Borderline speedy. BD2412  T 04:05, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete — Unverifiable and no assertion of notability.  Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day. — Bill W. (Talk) (Contrib)  –  February 20, 2006, 04:18 (UTC)
 * Delete: neologism. &mdash;Bunchofgrapes (talk) 04:40, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as unverifiable neologism.  OhNo itsJamie Talk 06:07, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as above.Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 06:33, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:V, WP:NEO, WP:NFT... take your pick. -- Kinu t /c  06:39, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above -- Ruby  14:42, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable unverifiable unstable neologism, i.e. protologism. Adrian~enwiki (talk) 20:20, 20 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.