Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mrs. Malfoy, Mrs. Tavington, and Mrs. Keegan Present Themselves


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Punkmorten 09:57, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

Mrs. Malfoy, Mrs. Tavington, and Mrs. Keegan Present Themselves
A bit of Harry Potter cruft. Prod removed so I am bringing it here. No context so I have to assume original "research", ie. fiction. -- RHaworth 20:18, 12 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete as per nom Jll 20:51, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as above. Or should I say expeliarmus? Just zis Guy you know? 21:04, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per all that is holy. Fanficruft of the fanficruftiest variety. I feel stupider for reading the article. -- Kinu  t /c  21:52, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

"Expelliarmus" is spelled with two l's. And if you'd read it, you'd know it's not about Harry Potter anyway. *coughjasonisaacscough*
 * Um, it is Pottercruft. But thank you, I do feel better for knowing that I have not, in fact, sunk to the level of actually knowing how to spell spells :-)


 * Whiskey Tango Foxtrot?! I don't know what to think of this. Sounds like a bunch of Jason Issacs fangirls trying to make a name for themselves. This has nothing to do with Harry Potter, or any widely recognised fictional setting. No context, a mad attempt to promote themselves through categories... it goes on and on to look like a reasonable attempt at creating a fanpage for an actor within an encyclopedia (Wikipedia is not a free host or webspace provider)-- Saberwyn 01:20, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
 * While you're at it, kill the images. -- Saberwyn 03:07, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete and the related articles   Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk  01:33, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete per Saberwyn. --Metropolitan90 02:24, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Saberwyn. --Ter e nce Ong 02:28, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per terence ong --Khoikhoi 08:45, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as subtrivial fancruft. MCB 20:36, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per all of the above. The ladies can jolly well un-present themselves, thank you very much. Her Pegship 16:40, 15 March 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.