Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mrunal Jain


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete without prejudice. Poorly sourced BLP. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:14, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

Mrunal Jain

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Article has been deleted and recreated several times. The last deletion was noted as having followed a deletion discussion, but I am unable to uncover that discussion (perhaps with a different spelling?). In any case, I've tried to find reliable source coverage and am unable to locate significant coverage to establish notability. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 22:17, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 03:06, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 03:07, 28 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment: Am unaware of an earlier AFD, or how long ago it might have been... so for sake of discussion, let's pretend this is the first. He seems popular enough in India so that when he was seen buying jeans, he was "mobbed" by his fans.  And searches show he has recieved some coverage for his work in such reliable sources as MSN India, Times of India, Mumbai Mirror, Indya.com, Deccan Chronicle, and Daily News & Analysis. and did star in such as Hitler Didi. and several other notable projects, so it might be arguable that though weak on WP:GNG, he has verifiability showing he pushes at WP:ENT.  Unfortunately, Indian news media quite often uses a short format for reporting of what is of note to their country, and while offering verifiability of his works, such short and to-the-point blurbs are not seen as being substantial coverage. I know that notability is not dependent upon brief mentions, but even if in reliable sources and short and to the point, do we then automatically dismiss them as  "trivial" simply because of that format being the India media's preferred way of reporting?  A thought-provoking question? Perhaps. I am reminded that the spirit and the letter of the notability guidelines are concerned with having sources offering enough content for us write articles from a neutral point of view. So even if short, do the available sources provide us with enough information to do just that... confirm his work and write a neutral article?  Worth a ponder.   Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 06:34, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 17:27, 10 April 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.