Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ms. Brooklyn


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 17:10, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Ms. Brooklyn
Wikipedia is not a crystal ball Blood red sandman 18:52, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. ---Charles 19:18, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - nom isn't good, but failure of WP:V is a good reason to delete. WilyD 19:31, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:V. Most of the sources I find are for blogs, message boards, etc. Unless something that meets WP:RS reports on this, WP:NOT a crystal ball as to possible names. -- Kinu  t /c  19:59, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge to Atlantic Yards. The official Atlantic Yards Overview and a recent New York Times article are reliable sources for the name of "Miss Brooklyn", not "Ms.". (Ms. and Miss are often confused with each other, of course.) As the height of the proposed building is being debated, it would be best to merge for now. Tinlinkin 03:50, 6 September 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.