Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ms Mr


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. J04n(talk page) 18:19, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Ms Mr

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doubtful notability - lots of references, but none seem to be from independent sources. Also promotional. Deb (talk) 14:33, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep. It is perhaps a little early in their career for an article, given that they haven't yet released an album, but there is some coverage already out there from reliable sources: . I think this just about meets WP:BAND. — sparklism hey! 14:44, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  — sparklism  hey! 14:45, 10 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2013 March 10.  Snotbot   t &bull; c &raquo;  14:59, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Sorry! Deb (talk) 15:03, 10 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep. I think the sources listed above, along with others that exist - Pitchfork has more write-ups on this duo, and here's one from MTV - are enough to meet WP:BAND #1.  Gong   show  16:59, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Very likely - I am unfamiliar with Pitchfork. Deb (talk) 19:00, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. It's no worse article than other articles about new artists and their are plenty of pages like this currently on Wikipedia with a similar amount of information. It is also hardly promotional as the article just gives information on the single and album releases and reviews like alot of other pages. FireFinder 15:45, 11 March 2013
 * Comment - Actually, having now read the wikipedia article on Pitchfork Media, I am amused to realise that the OTT style of the article is in perfect keeping with the sources! :-) Deb (talk) 16:27, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. There's plenty of information and at this point the band is famous enough and has released enough to warrant an article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ben Knapp (talk • contribs) 20:30, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.