Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MtPaint


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Spartaz Humbug! 16:49, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

MtPaint

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Software does not appear to have been the subject of significant coverage in reliable publications (WP:GNG). Marasmusine (talk) 15:18, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Insufficient non-trivial coverage in reliable secondary sources to satisfy our notability guidelines. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 15:40, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:16, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Not caring either way. In 2005 when article came to be, I might have cared; in 2008, I have no reason to. The default image editor on Eee PC (you likely have heard of the device), in Damn Small Linux and Puppy Linux (ranks 10 and 12 on DistroWatch) and in several other distros of the top 100 - for users this is notable enough, and for a few dead-tree journalists as well (see Linux Format issues 63 and 84, for example). Whether it is for a random deletionist, does not matter in the slightest outside of his playground. Dmitry Groshev, maintainer of mtPaint  wjaguar (talk) 08:40, 18 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.