Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mu sigma chi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. As lacking the required coverage; a link to a Google search results page is not enough to establish such coverage.  Sandstein  06:42, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Mu sigma chi

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Does not meet Wikipedia's notability requirements, as per WP:ORG NYCRuss   ☎  18:59, 22 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Strong delete. Meets neither WP:ORG nor WP:GNG. —C.Fred (talk) 19:14, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep – Sorry to disagree here, but I do believe it meets our requirements as shown by this coverage of the organization from – third party – reliable – creditable – independent sources . In addition, it does claim the notability of Denison University first fraternity.  Thanks. ShoesssS Talk 20:08, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Strong delete - Local chapters of national fraternities are usually not going to be notable. There are not enough references here to justify otherwise. The hits in google news seems to be a few random awards (intra-fraternity awards grow on trees) and some hazing coverage.  There's nothing about the fraternity.  Being notable within Denison University does not "notable" within Wikipedia make. Actually, this might be a case of flat out db-club or even db-spam.--GrapedApe (talk) 21:04, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:ORG - insufficient reliable independent coverage. Bridgeplayer (talk) 14:40, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:ORG. Lacks the necessary reliable sources. Bridgeplayer (talk) 14:45, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment for above did you double review the article? Seems you looked twice here Ottawa4ever (talk) 18:08, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Oops, thanks for the heads up. Bridgeplayer (talk) 22:28, 23 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  —• Gene93k (talk) 02:02, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:03, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.