Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mubabinge Bilolo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 11:33, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Mubabinge Bilolo

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This article appears to be a non-notable vanity article, possibly created/maintained by the article's subject. The article does not assert that:
 * 1) the subject "is regarded as a significant expert in his or her area by independent sources."
 * 2) the subject "is regarded as an important figure by independent academics in the same field."
 * 3) the subject's "collective body of work is significant and well-known."
 * 4) the subject "has received a notable award or honor, or has been often nominated for them."
 * 5) the subject "is the originator of an idea or concept that is significant and important within its area."

Further, none of the publications are of general interest or are well-known, and many appear to be published by or in conjunction with the very institution the subject works for, namely the "African Institute for Future Sciences – INADEP"

Few (none?) of the "sources" and external links are independent of the subject. Jeff Dahl (Talk • contribs) 00:21, 1 November 2007 (UTC) The article asserts that:
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletions.   —David Eppstein 04:26, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom.--Crusio 10:29, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom -- Dougie WII 12:50, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, also: fails WP:PROF as not being a full professor, and not having published any textbooks in the English language. This is en.wikipedia.org. Bearian&#39;sBooties 19:35, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. No indication this person passes WP:PROF. Doctorfluffy 19:39, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) the subject "is regarded as a significant expert in his area of ancient egyptian philosophy and theology, of african religion and philosophy" by independent sources". The subject "is regarded as the best and the top one in the area of ancient egyptian philosophy"
 * 2) the subject "is working for African Institute for Future Sciences as the chairman of Centre of Egyptology"
 * 4) the subject "is regarded as an important figure by independent academics in the field of philosophy, egyptology and african culture. cf. Discussions in Egyptology, Special Number 2 or Centre d'Estudis Africans Barcelona"
 * 5) the subject's "collective body of work is significant and well-known."
 * 6) the subject "is the originator of an idea or concept about ancient egyptian cosmo-theology, african philosophy and african culture that is significant and important within its area."
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.