Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mubaligh-e-azam Maulana Muhammad Ismael Deobandi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 17:47, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Mubaligh-e-azam Maulana Muhammad Ismael Deobandi

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Uncertain notability. Oscarthecat (talk) 19:28, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    22:05, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    22:06, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    22:06, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    22:06, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete. The only source I can find is this . If it's kept it needs to be moved to Muhammad Ismail Deobandi, because "Mubaligh-e-azam" and "Maulana" are titles. --Samuel J. Howard (talk) 14:32, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:23, 29 October 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor Talk! 18:57, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails GNG and ANYBIO. Cavarrone 22:01, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:40, 12 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - per the current info in the article, not sure there's even an assertion of notability there. Regardless, searches turned up nothing to show they meet WP:GNG.  Onel 5969  TT me 16:57, 13 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.